Enkuklopadeia

Cogito, ergo sum

Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

Next revision
Previous revision
notebooks:atom [2025/01/31 20:19] – created - external edit 127.0.0.1notebooks:atom [2025/02/12 16:16] (current) – external edit 127.0.0.1
Line 3: Line 3:
 The idea of a fundamental particle (maybe unit) seems to be originated The idea of a fundamental particle (maybe unit) seems to be originated
 in Greek and Indian philosophy independently. In Greek philosophy, in Greek and Indian philosophy independently. In Greek philosophy,
-[Democritus](Democritus.html) suggested the idea of atom around 400-300 +[Democritus](democritus) suggested the idea of atom around 400-300 
-BCE, while in [Indian philosophy](IndianPhilosophy.html), It was +BCE, while in [Indian philosophy](indianPhilosophy), It was 
-[Kanada](Kanada.html) who proposed the idea of paramanu (Atom) around+[Kanada](kanada) who proposed the idea of paramanu (Atom) around
 600-200 BCE.\ 600-200 BCE.\
 \ \
 However, both ideas of atom are very different. However, both ideas of atom are very different.
-[Democritus\'s](Democritus.html) atom has no qualitative differences, +[Democritus's](democritus) atom has no qualitative differences, 
-while [Kanada\'s](Kanada.html) atom differed both quantitatively and+while [Kanada's](kanada) atom differed both quantitatively and
 qualitatively. qualitatively.